| An EMPI Can Integrate the Delivery System
The EMPI is becoming the access point for linking patient information from multiple clinical and financial systems. HIM professionals’ roles will expand and become more visible with the increased responsibility of monitoring and maintaining the data integrity of an EMPI.
By Jo Ann Yamamoto, MA, RHIA, and Joseph Hewitt, MA
Delivery systems are now the norm in the health care industry. With the incorporation of many entities into one organization, the functionality and maintenance of the master patient index (MPI) has been transformed into a more complex Enterprise MPI (EMPI), which allows a patient to be identified both longitudinally and across the continuum of care. The EMPI becomes the access point for linking patient information from multiple clinical and financial systems. The creation of patient-centric views of patient data, as opposed to facility-specific views now available, is a necessary step in integrating care across facilities. This is an important step in actually becoming an integrated delivery system (IDS).
As patients enter the delivery system, they must be accurately identified and assigned a medical record number. Varia-tion is inherent to the process of assigning identifiers. It creates a fragmented view of the patient that, in turn, creates numerous problems that ripple across the facility and spill into the entire organization. Variation upsets physician-staff relations, ties up limited resources needed to resolve errors, and most importantly, increases clinical and legal risks.
The Patient Bill of Rights, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the recent publicity of adverse medical events will only serve to increase an organization’s exposure to this problem. If health care delivery is to be significantly improved, fragmented processes and data integrity issues need integrated approaches. A well-designed EMPI is an important element in managing variation in patient identifiers, thus enabling improvement of integrated processes.
The role of health information management (HIM) professionals will expand and become more visible with the increased responsibility of monitoring and maintaining the data integrity of an EMPI. This expanded role for HIM professionals will require a working knowledge of an EMPI, including patient identifier variation, functionality of the EMPI, review and resolution of errors, and integration with the IDS.
Patient Identifier Variation
What is the extent of this problem? A recent sample of 109 MPIs showed an average error rate of 9 percent; those containing more than 1 million records had an average error rate of 11 percent. The latter indicates that approximately one out of every 20 MRNs was assigned in error.
The second category of variation is not a result of an error, but occurs when a patient visits more than one facility and consequently is issued different MRNs by the various facilities within the IDS. This is a natural result of individual facilities maintaining their own MRNs.
The first category of variation, errors in the MRN assignment process, complicates the successful management of the second category of variation, the linking of different MRNs from across the enterprise. One error at the facility level converts to multiple errors at the enterprise level. The goal is to produce one unique set of identifiers that describe an individual patient. At a facility level, this means one MRN per person. At the enterprise level, this means one set of identifiers comprising one MRN per facility, or one MRN to be used by all systems across the enterprise.
Functionality of the EMPI
Additionally, basic EMPI functionality should establish the enterprise linkage of MRNs from across the delivery system and provide:
Most vendors use an “exact match” algorithm, based upon a combination of name, date of birth, gender and social security number. They may in-clude some level of fuzzy search–not quite exact–using partial names. These are defined as “deterministic” algorithms.
The second type of algorithm is called “probabilistic” because comparison scores are based upon the relative frequency of occurrence of attribute values being compared. As an example, assume that two records being compared are from an MPI where the name Smith occurs more frequently than Hewitt. In this case, matches involving the name Smith would yield a lower score (less likely to represent the same person) than potential matches based upon the name of Hewitt (higher probability of a match). A probabilistic algorithm uses a number of other search procedures to identify variation, such as searches by social security number, alternative keys, phonetic keys or by telephone number.
Review and Resolution of Errors
HIM professionals are the primary users of error review and resolution tools. These tools should not only identify potential errors but also provide work queuing and management reporting to effectively monitor corrective efforts for all systems.
The next major source of integration is the development of interfaces from the existing source systems to provide all registration event type messages, such as new registrations, demographic updates, medical record merge transactions, etc. If developed properly, they will provide the EMPI with all MPI-related transactions. When the interface is turned on, the EMPI should begin checking each message for potential errors. If a correction is required, the source system MPI will also need to be corrected. This can be done manually or via an interface to the source system.
Role of the HIM Professional
Jo Ann Yamamoto is senior consultant, professional services division, Madison Information Technologies Inc. Joseph Hewitt is vice president of product and service for Madison.